Patients Against I-502 |
Patients Against New Approach Washington |
Patients Against New Approach Washington |
Resources From Patients Against I-502
What the Law Says Now
(1) A person is guilty of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug if the person drives a vehicle in this state:
a) And the person has, within two hours after driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or higher as shown by analysis of the person’s breath or blood made under RCW 46.61.506; or
b) While the person is under the influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor or any drug; or
c) While the person is under the combined influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor and any drug.
Current Washington State Law – RCW 46.61.502
How I-502 Will Change the Law
(1) A person is guilty of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug if the person drives a vehicle within this state:
(a) And the person has, within two hours after driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or higher as shown by analysis of the person’s breath or blood made under RCW 46.61.506; or
(b) While the person is under the influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor or any drug; or
(c) While the person is under the combined influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor and any drug; or
(d) that the THC concentration of the driver’s blood is 5.00 or more; or the driver is under age 21 and the THC concentration of the driver’s blood is above 0.00
Text of Washington Initiative 502 (PART V – Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana)
What Science Says
“Scientific evidence on cannabis and driving is not yet sufficient to permit the selection of a numerical enforceable THC limit with the same level of confidence as for alcohol.”
Grotenherman et. al. “Developing Science-Based Per Se Limits For Driving Under The Influence of Cannabis”
“Substantial whole blood THC concentrations persist multiple days after drug discontinuation in heavy chronic cannabis users.”
Karschner et. al. “Do Delta-9 THC Concentrations Indicate Recent Use in Chronic Cannabis Users?”
“It is not possible to conclude anything about a driver’s impairment on the basis of his/her plasma concentrations.”
U.S. Department of Transportation “Marijuana and Actual Driving Performance: Effects of THC on Driving Perfomance”
“Due to the invasiveness of the collection procedure and the cost of laboratory analysis, routine screening of blood for drugs in drivers has generally been viewed as impractical.”
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “State of Knowledge of Drug-Impaired Driving”
What Legal Experts Say
“Many newly proposed DUID laws — in particular “zero tolerance” per se laws — have little to do with promoting public safety or identifying motorists who drive while intoxicated.”
DUID Legislation: What it means, who’s behind it and strategies to prevent it
“Alcohol-impaired driving per se laws are based on evidence that all drivers are impaired at .08 BAC. Drug per se laws are more analogous to zero-tolerance laws that make it illegal to drive with certain drugs in the system.”
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “Drug Per Se Laws: A Review Of Their Use In States”
“Under the proposed statute I-502 offers, an individual-who may be sober-will be found guilty of DUI merely because of 5ng.”
Green DUI’s, Medical Marijuana, and Initiative 502
What National Reform Groups Say
“In some chronic users, THC may be present in blood for a period of days after past use, long after any performance impairing effects have worn off.”
Armentano, P. “Cannabis and Driving: A Scientific and Rational Review”
“This is a particular concern for medical marijuana patients who are using marijuana in compliance with state laws and their doctors’ advice, but who would likely test positive for marijuana while sober.”
Marijuana and DUI Laws: How Can We Best Guard Against Impaired Driving?
“Motorists may be criminally prosecuted if trace levels of cannabis or cannabis metabolites are found in the driver’s bodily fluids, even if the individual is neither under the influence nor impaired to drive.”
Researchers Proposed Per Se Guidelines for Cannabis and Drugged Driving
“Heavy users might exhibit measurable cannabinoid concentrations in blood, even if the last cannabis use was more than 24 hours ago.”
Colorado’s 5 ng/ml per se DUID bill dies again as new research backs higher thresholds for regular users
Recommendations To Elected Officials
“This report demonstrates that a 5 nanogram per se law would be: 1) unnecessary 2) unsupported by the science; and 3) unlikely to significantly improve public safety”
Marijuana DUI Workgroup Recommendation to the Drug Policy Task Force and Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice
“Discussions by the experts of the per se limit related to driving impairment ranged from 1‐2 ng/ml to 15 ng/ml. A low threshold would likely include individuals whose driving ability was not impaired…”
Marijuana DUID Working Group Memorandum to Drug Policy Task Force
“Cannabis alone, particularly in low doses, has little effect on the skills involved in automobile driving.”
Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs “Cannabis: Summary Report: Our Position for a Canadian Public Policy”
“…impairment might occur with an individual with just 2 nanograms per milliliter of blood, while another person might be unimpaired until he registered 15 nanogr
ams.”
Marijuana Working Group Decides Not To Recommend Specific THC Driving Limits
What Real Life Experiences Show
“Even when deemed sober by a doctor, my active THC levels were almost triple the proposed standard of 5 nanograms per milliliter of blood.”
THC blood test: Pot critic William Breathes nearly 3 times over proposed limit when sober
“We have tested four medical marijuana users (defendants in DUID cases) to determine the time course of THC concentrations in their blood for times up to 16 hours after the last marijuana use. Every single one of the subjects showed significantly elevated THC and THC-OH concentrations long after they might have been impaired.”
N = 1 Trials by Dr. Robert K. Lantz
“NAW’s proposed blood limit of five nanograms per milliliter of active tetrahydrocannabinol (5 ng/ml THC) is unrealistic, and worse than useless – it would effectively criminalize driving by most patients, even when they’re completely unimpaired by cannabis.”
NAW: DUI Limits Mean Initiative Is Fatally Flawed
“The Legislature recently defeated a measure which would have limited blood THC levels at five nanograms per millilter (ng/ml). Advocates said the measure was far too strict, and would, in effect, have banned medical marijuana patients from legally driving.”
HD Net ‘World Report’ Looks At Driving While High